Strickland v. Safeway Inc. et al
| Damarco Strickland |
| Sergio Palacios Castro, Safeway Inc. and Maria Lazzerini |
| 3:2021cv00396 |
| January 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Damarco Strickland.. (Appel, Ehud) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/17/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Maria Lazzerini, Sergio Palacios Castro, Safeway Inc... (Lee, Theodora) (Filed on 1/28/2021) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Maria Lazzerini, Sergio Palacios Castro, Safeway Inc. re #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, (Garcia Perez, Yesenia) (Filed on 1/21/2021) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Theodora Rochelle Lee (Lee, Theodora) (Filed on 1/20/2021) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 4/12/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/29/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL DEFENDANTS SAFEWAY INC., SERGIO PALACIOS CASTRO, AND MARIA LAZZERINI'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO FEDERAL COURT from Alameda County Superior. Their case number is RG20082012. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15450964). Filed byMaria Lazzerini, Sergio Palacios Castro, Safeway Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Yesenia Garcia Perez ISO Removal to Federal Court with Exhibits A-D, #3 Declaration of Jessica Taylor with Exhibits 1 and2, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Garcia Perez, Yesenia) (Filed on 1/15/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
