Hurlocker v. APTIM Services, LLC
Plaintiff: John Hurlocker
Defendant: APTIM Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00403
Filed: January 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Robert M Illman
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/10/2021 09:30 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/3/2021. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/22/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
February 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
February 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 2/17/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021)
February 16, 2021 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)
February 12, 2021 Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: SECOND NOTICE Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (glmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2021)
February 12, 2021 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by John Hurlocker.. (Parmet, Matthew) (Filed on 2/12/2021)
February 10, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE filed by John Hurlocker of Filing Consent (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 - Consent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 - Consent, #5 Exhibit 5 - Consent, #6 Exhibit 6 - Consent, #7 Exhibit 7 - Consent, #8 Exhibit 8 - Consent, #9 Exhibit 9 - Consent, #10 Exhibit 10 - Consent, #11 Exhibit 11 - Consent)(Parmet, Matthew) (Filed on 2/10/2021)
February 10, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number 0971-15560617) filed by John Hurlocker. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Fitz, Carl) (Filed on 2/10/2021)
February 10, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number 0971-15560557) filed by John Hurlocker. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Dunlap, Andrew) (Filed on 2/10/2021)
February 10, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice, (Filing Fee: $317.00, receipt number 0971-15560358) filed by John Hurlocker. (Attachments: #(1) Certificate/Proof of Service Certificate of Good Standing)(Josephson, Michael) (Filed on 2/10/2021)
January 29, 2021 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (glmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021)
January 19, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to APTIM Services, LLC. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021)
January 19, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4 /13/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/20/2021 at 2:00 PM in McKinleyville. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021)
January 15, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/29/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
January 15, 2021 Filing 3 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons filed by John Hurlocker (Parmet, Matthew) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
January 15, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Parmet, Matthew) (Filed on 1/15/2021)
January 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against APTIM Services, LLC, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-15451350). Filed by John Hurlocker. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit 1 - Consent, #(2) Civil Cover Sheet)(Parmet, Matthew) (Filed on 1/15/2021) Modified on 1/19/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hurlocker v. APTIM Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: APTIM Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Hurlocker
Represented By: Michael Andrew Josephson
Represented By: Melodie K. Arian
Represented By: Matthew Scott Parmet
Represented By: Carl Fitz
Represented By: Andrew Wells Dunlap
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?