Mignone v. Monsanto Company et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Mignone
Defendant: Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC, Monsanto Company and Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv00501
Filed: January 21, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Filing 10 REPLY (re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees ) filed byJoseph Mignone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Lemon, John) (Filed on 3/12/2021)
March 5, 2021 Filing 9 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Remand to State Court MOTION for Attorney Fees ) filed byMonsanto Company. (Hollingsworth, Joe) (Filed on 3/5/2021)
February 19, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Remand to State Court, MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Joseph Mignone. Motion Hearing set for 4/1/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 3/5/2021. Replies due by 3/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit)(Lemon, John) (Filed on 2/19/2021)
February 18, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court, MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Joseph Mignone. Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 3/4/2021. Replies due by 3/11/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit)(Lemon, John) (Filed on 2/18/2021)
January 22, 2021 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 4/20/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/27/2021 02:00 PM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2021)
January 21, 2021 DIRECT FILE MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2741, Mignone v. Monsanto Company et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-00501 VC pursuant to Notice of Removal from San Francisco Superior Court. cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Cases associated: Create association to 3:16-cv-02741-EDL. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Monsanto Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 1/21/2021)
January 21, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Mignone Lawsuit from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-20-585819. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15471285). Filed by Monsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Complaint attached - Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 1/21/2021) Modified on 1/22/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mignone v. Monsanto Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Represented By: Samuel Zachary Fayne
Represented By: Joe G. Hollingsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Mignone
Represented By: Gerald Blaine Singleton
Represented By: Mark F. Fleming
Represented By: Timothy Allen Scott
Represented By: Kristen D. Miller
Represented By: Nicolas Omar Jimenez Lopez
Represented By: John Carl Lemon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?