Ferrantino v. First Security
| Anthony Ferrantino |
| First Security |
| 3:2021cv00503 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Defendant First Security. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2021) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Acknowledgement of receipt re #5 Summons Issued. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendant First Security. (Attachments: #(1) USM-285 Form) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) |
| service packet delivered to the United States Marshals Service Post Box in the Clerk's Office mailroom. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2021) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California shall serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint, any amendments or attachments, Plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon Defendant(s). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/26/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/15/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/22/2021 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Anthony Ferrantino. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT; JURY TRIAL DEMAND (no process) against First Security, (Filing Fee:Ifpp entered 1/19/2021). Filed by Anthony Ferrantino. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet, #(2) Envelope) (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ferrantino v. First Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anthony Ferrantino | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: First Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
