Willrich v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: J. Michael Willrich
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A National Association and Bank of America, N.A.
Petitioner: Jennifer Yick
Case Number: 3:2021cv00547
Filed: January 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER AS MODIFIED by Judge Vince Chhabria granting (43) Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule. Associated Cases: 3:21-cv-00376-VC, 3:21-cv-00494-VC, 3:21-cv-00547-VC, 3:21-cv-00572-VC, 3:21-cv-00615-VC, 3:21-cv-00699-VC, 3:21-cv-00743-VC, 3:21-cv-00869-VC, 3:21-cv-01466-VC. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2021)
February 26, 2021 Filing 18 JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Enlarge Time for Briefing Schedule in Response to Plaintiff Jennifer Yicks Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Laura A. Stoll)(Stoll, Laura) (Filed on 2/26/2021) Modified on 3/1/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).
February 24, 2021 Filing 17 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Stoll, Laura) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 24, 2021 Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent BAC North America Holding Company for Bank of America, N.A.. and Certification of Interested Entities or Persons Pursuant to Local Rule 3-15 (Stoll, Laura) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 24, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Alexandra Stoll (Stoll, Laura) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 24, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by David Rossiter Callaway (Callaway, David) (Filed on 2/24/2021)
February 13, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE by Jennifer Yick Notice of Motion, Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Joint Motion to: (1) Consolidate Related Actions; (2) Appoint Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP and Altshuler Berzon LLP as Interim Co-Lead Counsel and Proposed Executive Committee (Danitz, Brian) (Filed on 2/13/2021)
February 12, 2021 Filing 12 Case reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Judge Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2021)
February 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 2/11/2021. (vclc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2021)
February 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 02/09/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2021)
February 8, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2021)
February 5, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by J. Michael Willrich. Bank of America, N.A. served on 2/3/2021, answer due 2/24/2021. (Serino, Natasha) (Filed on 2/5/2021)
February 5, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by J. Michael Willrich.. (Serino, Natasha) (Filed on 2/5/2021)
January 27, 2021 Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by J. Michael Willrich (Serino, Natasha) (Filed on 1/27/2021)
January 25, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bank of America, N.A.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2021)
January 25, 2021 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2021)
January 25, 2021 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/8/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2021)
January 22, 2021 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Serino, Natasha) (Filed on 1/22/2021)
January 22, 2021 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against Bank of America, N.A. (Filing fee $ 402.00, receipt number 0971-15480832.). Filed by J. Michael Willrich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Serino, Natasha) (Filed on 1/22/2021) Modified on 1/25/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Willrich v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: J. Michael Willrich
Represented By: Natasha N. Serino
Represented By: Shannon F. Nocon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., A National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Laura Alexandra Stoll
Represented By: David Rossiter Callaway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jennifer Yick
Represented By: Brian Danitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?