Express Mobile, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc.
| Express Mobile, Inc. |
| Dropbox, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01145 |
| February 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1126 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying #27 Motion to Stay. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021)
|
| Filing 28 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #27 MOTION to Stay PENDING EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF THE 397 PATENT ) filed byExpress Mobile, Inc.. (Molo, Steven) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
| Filing 27 MOTION to Stay PENDING EX PARTE REEXAMINATION OF THE 397 PATENT filed by Dropbox, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/29/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Responses due by 4/2/2021. Replies due by 4/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Yang, Irene) (Filed on 3/19/2021) |
| Filing 26 Refund Status re #24 Application for Refund Approved. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2021) |
|
Filing 25
ORDER RE POTENTIAL STAY MOTIONS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/12/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2021)
|
| Filing 24 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-15582502 by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
| Filing 23 Refund Status re #17 Application for Refund: Declined. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Saurabh Prabhakar (Prabhakar, Saurabh) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Sue Wang (Wang, Sue) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Bettinger (Bettinger, Michael) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
| Filing 19 Certificate of Interested Entities by Dropbox, Inc. DROPBOX, INC.S DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1 AND CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 3-15 (Yang, Irene) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
| Filing 18 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byDropbox, Inc.. (Yang, Irene) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
| Filing 17 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-15582502 by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 3/10/2021) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER RE COORDINATION OF CLAIM CONSTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/9/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Sarah J. Newman. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Benoit Quarmby. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Steven F. Molo. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Leonid Grinberg. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2021)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15605613.) filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Newman, Sarah) (Filed on 2/22/2021) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15605493.) filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Quarmby, Benoit) (Filed on 2/22/2021) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15605464.) filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Molo, Steven) (Filed on 2/22/2021) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-15605394.) filed by Express Mobile, Inc.. (Grinberg, Leonid) (Filed on 2/22/2021) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/13/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/20/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Dropbox, Inc. (arkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2021) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Express Mobile, Inc. (Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 2/16/2021) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent (cc: form mailed to register). (Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 2/16/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 2/16/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dropbox, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15582525.). Filed byExpress Mobile, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gross, Stuart) (Filed on 2/16/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
