Black v. Google LLC et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Black
Defendant: Alphabet Inc. and Google LLC
Case Number: 3:2021cv01200
Filed: February 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: James Donato
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2021 Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Missouri Eastern; Case Number 4:21-cv-00077. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
February 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF MDL TRANSFER to: Northern District of California. Case transferred via CM/ECF extraction. (DJO)
February 18, 2021 MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2981: Eastern District of Missouri (St. Louis), 4:21-cv-00077-SEP, Black v. Google LLC et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-01200-JD pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 1 cc: JPMDL (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2021)
February 17, 2021 Filing 5 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) regarding MDL No. 2981 IN RE: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel. (DJO)
February 10, 2021 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Nicholas Black. Alphabet Inc served on 2/4/2021, answer due 2/25/2021. (Simon, Anthony)
February 10, 2021 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Nicholas Black. Google LLC served on 2/4/2021, answer due 2/25/2021. (Simon, Anthony)
January 21, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Nicholas Black Process Server: Brandywine Process Servers (Attachments: #1 Summons Google LLC, #2 Summons Alphabet Inc)(Simon, Anthony)
January 21, 2021 Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-8418336, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand, filed by Nicholas Black. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Simon, Anthony) Modified on 2/18/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF).
January 21, 2021 Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Anthony G. Simon. All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Sarah E. Pitlyk. (BAK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Black v. Google LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alphabet Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Google LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Black
Represented By: Anthony G. Simon
Represented By: Paul J. Tahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?