Spencer v. Monsanto Company
Cary J. Spencer |
Monsanto Company |
3:2021cv01510 |
March 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [Plaintiff Cary Spencer] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/29/2021) |
Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [Plaintiff Cary Spencer] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/29/2021) |
Filing 9 Monsanto Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [Plaintiff Cary Spencer] byMonsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/29/2021) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Daniel W. Bower filed by Cary J. Spencer. Responses due by 3/19/2021. Replies due by 3/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nolen, Rand) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Rand Patrick Nolen (Nolen, Rand) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Idaho; Case Number 1:21-cv-00057. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2741, District of Idaho, 1:21-cv-00057 DCN, Spencer v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-01510 VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 258 cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO MDL PANEL for N.D. of California MDL 2741 (CTO-258) (Attachments: #1 email relecting MDL text entry- stay is lifted, #2 email of Text Only Entry tranferring case)(caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 4 ORDER- CTO-258 for MDL 2741 (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cary J. Spencer. Monsanto Company served on 2/11/2021, answer due 3/4/2021. (Bower, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (Print attached Summons for service.) (alw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0976-2163284.), filed by Cary J. Spencer. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Cover Sheet)(Bower, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Spencer v. Monsanto Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cary J. Spencer | |
Represented By: | Daniel W Bower |
Represented By: | Rand Patrick Nolen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.