Harford County Public Schools v. Juul Labs Inc. et al
| Harford County Public Schools |
| John Does, 1 through 100 inclusive, Altria Group, Inc., Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Client Services, Juul Labs Inc., Nu Mark LLC, Philip Morris USA Inc., James Monsees, Juul Labs Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Riaz Valani, Adam Bowen, Nicholas Pritzker and Hoyoung Huh |
| 3:2021cv01531 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Amended Complaint Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Hoyoung Huh, Juul Labs Inc., James Monsees, Philip Morris USA Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Riaz Valani. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021) |
| Filing 7 Proposed Summons. (Shinoff, William) (Filed on 4/23/2021) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT Board of Education of Harford County CORRECTION OF DOCKET #3 against All Defendants. Filed byHarford County Public Schools. (Shinoff, William) (Filed on 4/23/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Juul Labs Inc., Philip Morris USA Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. E-filer is reminded to enter parties as named in the Complaint (pages 13-17) and party not named will be removed from the docket. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #3 Complaint filed by Harford County Public Schools. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
| DIRECT FILE MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2913, Harford County Public Schools v. Juul Labs Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-01531 WHO cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Cases associated: Create association to 3:19-md-02913-WHO. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15652236.). Filed byHarford County Public Schools. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shinoff, William) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Shinoff, William) (Filed on 3/3/2021) |
| Filing 1 *** ERRONEOUS ENTRY. SEE #3 *** AMENDED COMPLAINT SECOND against All Defendants. Filed byHarford County Public Schools. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shinoff, William) (Filed on 3/3/2021) Modified on 3/4/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
