Hernandez v. Quick Stop Markets, Inc. et al
| Gerardo Hernandez |
| Gagan Siyan, Quick Stop Markets, Inc., Sai Simran, LLC and Tarsem Siyan |
| 3:2021cv01560 |
| March 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond filed by Sai Simran, LLC. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 4/30/2021) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond filed by Sai Simran, LLC. (Vaughan, Cris) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by Quick Stop Markets, Inc.. (Lloyd, Thomas) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerardo Hernandez. Sai Simran, LLC served on 3/29/2021, answer due 4/19/2021. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/29/2021) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerardo Hernandez. Tarsem Siyan served on 3/22/2021, answer due 4/12/2021. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerardo Hernandez. Gagan Siyan served on 3/22/2021, answer due 4/12/2021. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerardo Hernandez. Quick Stop Markets, Inc. served on 3/11/2021, answer due 4/1/2021. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/18/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gerardo Hernandez.. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/15/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Quick Stop Markets, Inc., Sai Simran, LLC, Gagan Siyan, Tarsem Siyan. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/19/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Gerardo Hernandez (amended). (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Please resubmit Civil Cover Sheet with 446 as nature of suit. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using C ivil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Gerardo Hernandez (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT asserting denial of right of access under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15657876.). Filed byGerardo Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya) (Filed on 3/4/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
