Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. v. Ascendant Beauty, LLC et al
Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. |
Sephora USA, Inc., Guthy-Renker LLC, Ascendant Beauty, LLC and JLO Holding Company, LLC |
3:2021cv01993 |
March 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Richard Seeborg |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1114 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED filed by JLO Holding Company, LLC. (Llewellyn, Paul) (Filed on 5/6/2021) |
Filing 28 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED filed by Sephora USA, Inc.. (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 5/6/2021) |
Filing 27 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED filed by Guthy-Renker LLC. (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 5/6/2021) |
Filing 26 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED filed by Ascendant Beauty, LLC. (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 5/6/2021) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathalie Fayad (Fayad, Nathalie) (Filed on 4/19/2021) |
Filing 24 (1) RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, and (2) LOCAL RULE 3-15 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS filed by JLO Holding Company, LLC (Llewellyn, Paul) (Filed on 4/19/2021) |
Filing 23 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Timothy Llewellyn (Llewellyn, Paul) (Filed on 4/19/2021) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint filed by JLO Holding Company, LLC. (Llewellyn, Paul) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Schindler (Schindler, David) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Barry (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 19 LOCAL RULE 3-15 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS filed by Guthy-Renker LLC (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 18 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Sephora USA, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Inc., Corporate Parent LVHM Mot Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE for Sephora USA, Inc.. (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 17 LOCAL RULE 3-15 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSONS filed by Ascendant Beauty, LLC (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION To Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint filed by Ascendant Beauty, LLC, Guthy-Renker LLC, Sephora USA, Inc.. (Barry, Jennifer) (Filed on 4/15/2021) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/17/2021. All parties shall appear by videoconference using log-in instructions the Court will provide in advance. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) Case Management Statement due by 6/17/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2021 at 10:00 AM - Videoconference Only. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 14 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case,. Signed by The Clerk on 4/5/21. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc... (Kim, John) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. Sephora USA, Inc. served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. JLO Holding Company, LLC served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. Guthy-Renker LLC served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. Ascendant Beauty, LLC served on 3/26/2021, answer due 4/16/2021. (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/31/2021) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Defendants Ascendant Beauty, LLC, Guthy-Renker LLC, JLO Holding Company, LLC and Sephora USA, Inc.. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/17/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/24/2021 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2021) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/5/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES (CIV. L.R. 3-15) AND CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (F.R.C.P. 7.1) filed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Craig A. Kraffert, MD for Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. (Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement and Local Rule 3-15 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons) (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding a trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kim, John) (Filed on 3/22/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR: (1) TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT UNDER 15 U.S.C. 1114(1); (2) FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); (3) VIOLATION OF CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE 17200; (4) STATE COMMON LAW TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT; AND (5) STATE COMMON LAW PASSING OFF AND UNFAIR COMPETITION; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Ascendant Beauty, LLC, Guthy-Renker LLC, JLO Holding Company, LLC, Sephora USA, Inc., (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-15735278). Filed by Amarte USA Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kim, John) (Filed on 3/22/2021) Modified on 3/23/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.