Drevaleva v. Humes et al
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva |
Noel Wise and Jim Humes |
Narayan Travelstead Professional Law Corporation and Alameda Health System |
3:2021cv02222 |
March 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Edward M Chen |
Kandis A Westmore |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Certified copy of #15 Order emailed to USCA (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021) |
Filing 15 ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFFS IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/29/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 14 USCA REFERRAL NOTICE referring the matter to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith as to #12 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2021) |
Filing 13 USCA Case Number 21-15765 for #12 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2021) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. Appeal of Order on Motion to Vacate #11 (IFP Request was previously e-filed with the Court). (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(Drevaleva, Tatyana) (Filed on 4/24/2021)(USCA Case No. 21-15765) Modified on 4/29/2021 (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 ORDER DENYING #12 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT. Hearing set for 5/27/2021 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/22/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 10 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/9/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 9 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS, AND DISMISSING CASE NOS. C-21-1664 AND C-21-2222. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/9/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 8 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 21-2543. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 4/9/2021. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE. Based on the financial declaration, #2 Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. However, the Court reserves ruling with respect to its duty to screen Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). Accordingly, at this point, the Court does not order that Plaintiff's complaint be served. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 6 Case reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 5 ORDER RELATING CASE. Case related to 20-cv-7017-EMC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/2/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 3:20-cv-7017-EMC and 4:21-cv-02222-KAW. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 4/2/21. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 6/22/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2021 at 1:30 PM. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandate to Compel against Jim Humes, Noel Wise (IFPP. No process). Filed by Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.