Leonard v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al
Gary Leonard |
Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, McLane Company, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and Juul Labs, Inc. |
3:2021cv02396 |
April 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Juul Labs, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Kassan, Randi) (Filed on 4/29/2021) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons McLane Company, #2 Summons Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., #3 Summons Altria Enterprises LLC, #4 Summons Philip Morris USA, Inc., #5 Summons Altria Group, Inc., #6 Summons Altria Group Distribution Company, #7 Summons Altria Client Services LLC, #8 Summons Eby-Brown Company)(Kassan, Randi) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. [err201] PLEASE RE-FILE, USE ONLY ONE SUMMONS WITH ATTACHMENT FOR DEFENDANTS INFORMATION. ONLY ONE SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED. This filing will not be processe d by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #4 Proposed Summons, filed by Gary Leonard (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. [err201] PLEASE RE-FILE, USE ONLY ONE SUMMONS WITH ATTACHMENT FOR DEFENDANTS INFORMATION.This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re -file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Gary Leonard (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED: Leonard v. Juul Labs, Inc., et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-02396-WHO cc: JPMDL (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kassan, Randi) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15786221.). Filed byGary Leonard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kassan, Randi) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.