Core Optical Technologies, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Core Optical Technologies, LLC |
Juniper Networks Inc |
3:2021cv02428 |
April 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Sallie Kim |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 84 AMENDED COMPLAINT - THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byCore Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 2, #3 3, #4 4, #5 5, #6 6, #7 7, #8 8, #9 9, #10 10, #11 11, #12 12, #13 13, #14 14, #15 15, #16 16, #17 17, #18 18, #19 19, #20 20, #21 21, #22 22, #23 23, #24 24, #25 25, #26 26, #27 27, #28 28, #29 29, #30 30, #31 31, #32 32, #33 33, #34 34, #35 35, #36 36, #37 37, #38 38, #39 39, #40 40, #41 41, #42 42)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 5/28/2021) |
Filing 83 Order by Judge Vince Chhabria granting #73 Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint; denying #77 Motion to Dismiss; denying #78 Motion to Stay. Case Management Statement due by 9/1/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/8/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - To be determined.(vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2021) |
Filing 82 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #78 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss ) to Juniper's Re-Noticed Motion to Stay Discovery filed byCore Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 81 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #77 MOTION to Dismiss ) to Juniper's Re-Noticed Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed byCore Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 80 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Redacted Version of Reply in support of Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, #4 Unredacted Version of Reply in support of Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, #5 Declaration in support of Reply in support of Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Unredacted Version of Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Unredacted Version of Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Unredacted Version of Exhibit H, #14 Unredacted Version of Exhibit I, #15 Unredacted Version of Exhibit J, #16 Unredacted Version of Exhibit K, #17 Redacted Version of Exhibit J, #18 Redacted Version of Exhibit K, #19 Exhibit L)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 5/19/2021) |
Filing 79 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #73 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint ) Juniper's Opp to Core's MTA TAC filed byJuniper Networks Inc. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl of NH, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2, #4 Exhibit Ex. 3, #5 Exhibit Ex. 4, #6 Exhibit Ex. 5, #7 Exhibit Ex. 6)(Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 5/12/2021) |
Filing 78 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss filed by Juniper Networks Inc. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Telephonic Only before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 5/24/2021. Replies due by 6/1/2021. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 5/10/2021) |
Filing 77 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Juniper Networks Inc. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 5/24/2021. Replies due by 6/1/2021. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 5/10/2021) |
Filing 76 CLERK'S NOTICE terminating the Motion for Leave file at docket number #75 . Counsel only needed to re-notice the motion for hearing, not file an entirely new motion. The hearing date of 6/10/2021, will remain on calendar for the hearing on the Motion at docket number #73 . (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2021) |
Filing 75 MOTION for Leave to File (re-notice) filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Underwood in support of Motion for Leave, #2 Exhibit A, #3 B, #4 C, #5 D, #6 E, #7 F, #8 G, #9 H, #10 I, #11 J, #12 K, #13 L, #14 M, #15 N, #16 O, #17 P, #18 Q, #19 R, #20 S, #21 T, #22 U, #23 V, #24 W, #25 X, #26 Y, #27 Z, #28 AA, #29 AB, #30 AC, #31 AD, #32 AE, #33 AF, #34 AG, #35 AH, #36 AI, #37 AJ, #38 AK, #39 AL, #40 AM, #41 AN, #42 AO, #43 AP, #44 AQ, #45 AR, #46 AS, #47 AT, #48 AU)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 4/30/2021) Modified on 5/3/2021 (knmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 74 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing according to Judge Chhabria's available dates, which are listed on his webpage under the section "Scheduling Notes." The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Case Management Statement due by 6/16/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/23/2021, 02:00 PM, by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Ap pearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Thursday, June 17, 2021, by no later 10:00 a.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/ A>. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2021) |
Set Hearing as to #73 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 6/10/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Vince Chhabria. (knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2021) |
Filing 73 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of S. Underwood in support of Motion for Leave, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Exhibit X, #26 Exhibit Y, #27 Exhibit Z, #28 Exhibit AA, #29 Exhibit AB, #30 Exhibit AC, #31 Exhibit AD, #32 Exhibit AE, #33 Exhibit AF, #34 Exhibit AG, #35 Exhibit AH, #36 Exhibit AI, #37 Exhibit AJ, #38 Exhibit AK, #39 Exhibit AL, #40 Exhibit AM, #41 Exhibit AN, #42 Exhibit AO, #43 Exhibit AP, #44 Exhibit AQ, #45 Exhibit AR, #46 Exhibit AS, #47 Exhibit AT, #48 Exhibit AU)(Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 4/28/2021) |
Filing 72 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 4/13/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
Filing 71 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
Filing 70 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Juniper Networks Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
Filing 69 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Core Optical Technologies, LLC.. (Hadley, Lawrence) (Filed on 4/6/2021) |
Filing 68 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/13/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms.(mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2021) |
Filing 67 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/12/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2021) |
Filing 66 Case transferred in from District of California Central; Case Number 8:19-cv-02189. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 65 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JUNIPER'S MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. #45 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Defendant has carried its burden to show that a transfer of the action is warranted pursuant to 28 USC section 1404, the Motion is GRANTED and this action is transferred to the Northern District of California. Because the matter has been ordered transferred, rulings on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #34 ) and Defendant's Motion to Stay (Dkt. #35 ) are deferred so that the transferee court can address each of them. The Clerk is directed to transfer this action forthwith to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) Case transferred electronically. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp) |
Filing 64 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT REPORT (DKT. #63 ) AND SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Second Joint Report, this Order adopts a scheduling order as to each of the cases. Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff: 6/9/2021. Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement: 6/16/2021. Claim Construction Hearing: 7/26/2021 at 10:00 AM. Close of Discovery: 12/20/2021. Dispositive Motions Deadline: 1/17/2022. Last day to conduct settlement conference or mediation with Outside ADR/Non-Judicial neutral: 2/14/2022. Notice of Settlement or Joint Report Re Settlement: 2/18/2022. Post-Mediation Status Conference: 2/28/2022 at 1:30 PM. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp) |
Filing 63 STATUS REPORT SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT REPORT REGARDING STANDING PATENT RULES (S.P.R. 2.6-4.4), DEADLINE TO ADD PARTIES AND AMEND PLEADINGS, SCHEDULING, AND JUNIPERS MOTION TO TRANSFER filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 62 STATUS REPORT Supplemental Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 61 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan and Rule 16(b) Scheduling Proposals ; estimated length of trial Plaintiff: 5-7 days. Defendants: 4 days., filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC.. (Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 60 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE JOINT REPORT FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. #59 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Pursuant to the order setting the scheduling conference in this matter (Dkt. #59 ), the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report (the "Joint Report") shall be filed on or before October 9, 2020. To serve judicial and party efficiency and to expedite review, counsel in this action are ordered to confer with the parties in the following related actions: 8:19-cv-2190-JAK-RAO (Nokia); 8:20-cv-1463-JAK-RAO (ADVA); and 8:20-cv-1468-JAK-RAO (Cisco) in preparing the Joint Report. An identical Joint Report shall be filed in each action no later than October 9, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eth) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 59 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/9/2020. (cw) |
Filing 58 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS CORE'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. #33 ); DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (DKT. #34 ) AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (DKT. #45 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to the Motions and has concluded that pursuant to Local Rule 7.15, the matters can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motions, noticed for hearing on July 13, 2020, have been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 57 SUPPLEMENT to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #33 Supplemental Brief In Response to Juniper's Reply In Support of its Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 56 ORDER GRANTING CORE OPTICAL'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SURREPLY TO PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS (DKT. #53 ) AND DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE REQUEST (DKT. #55 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt Core's requests are GRANTED and Defendants' ex parte applications to strike DENIED. See Order for Specifics. (et) |
Filing 55 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike REQUEST for Leave to file Supplemental Brief on Juniper's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 33) #53 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application, #2 Declaration Hefazi Decl ISO Ex Part Application, #3 Exhibit Hefazi Decl Ex. 1) (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 54 NOTICE OF LODGING filed with Proposed Order re REQUEST for Leave to file Supplemental Brief on Juniper's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 33) #53 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 53 REQUEST for Leave to file Supplemental Brief on Juniper's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 33) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Request set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Supplemental Brief, #2 Exhibit B - U.S. Pat. No. 8,023,580) (Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 52 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California #45 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 51 REPLY In Support Of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #33 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 50 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California #45 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 49 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #33 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen Underwood, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 48 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Resolution of Juniper's Motion to Dismiss Core's SAC #34 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 47 Amendment to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Resolution of Juniper's Motion to Dismiss Core's SAC #34 Errata to Core's Opposition (ECF 43) to Juniper's Motion to Stay filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Corrected Opposition to Juniper's Motion to Stay)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 46 SEALED DOCUMENT UNREDACTED SEALED Junipers Memorandum In Support of Its Motion to Transfer re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California #45 , Order on Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal #41 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document UNREDACTED SEALED Di Mola Declaration iso Motion to Transfer)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 45 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Northern District of California filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum REDACTED PUBLIC Memorandum iso Motion to Transfer, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Transfer, #3 Declaration REDACTED PUBLIC Di Mola Declaration iso Motion to Transfer, #4 Declaration Briggs Declaration iso Motion to Transfer, #5 Exhibit Briggs Ex 1, #6 Exhibit Briggs Ex 2, #7 Exhibit Briggs Ex 3, #8 Exhibit Briggs Ex 4, #9 Exhibit Briggs Ex 5, #10 Exhibit Briggs Ex 6, #11 Exhibit Briggs Ex 7, #12 Exhibit Briggs Ex 8, #13 Exhibit Briggs Ex 9, #14 Exhibit Briggs Ex 10, #15 Exhibit Briggs Ex 11, #16 Exhibit Briggs Ex 12, #17 Exhibit Briggs Ex 13, #18 Exhibit Briggs Ex 14) (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION RE HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR JUNIPER'S MOTION TO TRANSFER (DKT. #42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The relief requested is granted. Juniper Network, Inc.'s ("Juniper") Motion to Transfer will be heard on July 13, 2020 concurrently with the other pending motions. No later than May 4, 2020, Juniper shall file a Notice of Motion to Transfer setting forth the July 13, 2020 hearing date. Any opposition is due May 26, 2020; a reply may be filed on or before June 8, 2020. Juniper's application for leave to file under seal was granted by the Court on April 28, 2020 (Dkt. #41 ); however, counsel have not yet filed the public redacted version, or the unredacted version, as required by Local Rule 79-5 and this Court's Standing Order. Counsel shall comply forthwith. (cw) |
Filing 43 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Resolution of Juniper's Motion to Dismiss Core's SAC #34 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Stephen Underwood, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 42 Joint STIPULATION for Hearing re and Briefing Schedule for Juniper's Motion to Transfer filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulation on Hearing and Briefing for Motion to Transfer)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 41 ORDER RE JUNIPER'S UNOPPOSED APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (DKT. #37 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Application is GRANTED, and the following documents shall be filed under seal. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER SPECIFICS). (jp) |
Filing 40 DECLARATION of Domenico di Mola re APPLICATION to file document Juniper's Unopposed Application for Leave to File Motion to Transfer and Supporting Declaration under seal #37 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 39 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION TO SEAL by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Defendant has filed an application to seal (the "Application" (Dkt. #37 )). The application is supported only by a declaration from counsel, and not from a percipient witness with knowledge of the commercial bases for the request to seal the information and associated filings. Dkt. 37-1. Therefore, on or before April 30, 2020, Defendant shall file a declaration that complies with these requirements. Thereafter, the Application will be considered. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (eth) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 38 SEALED DOCUMENT SEALED - REDACTED - Junipers Memorandum iso Motion to Transfer re APPLICATION to file document Juniper's Unopposed Application for Leave to File Motion to Transfer and Supporting Declaration under seal #37 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only,, #23 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Unredacted Document SEALED - PROPOSED REDACTIONS - Juniper's Memorandum iso Motion to Transfer, #2 Redacted Document SEALED - REDACTED - Di Mola Declaration iso Junipers Motion to Transfer, #3 Unredacted Document SEALED - PROPOSED REDACTIONS - Di Mola Declaration iso Juniper_s MTT)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 37 APPLICATION to file document Juniper's Unopposed Application for Leave to File Motion to Transfer and Supporting Declaration under seal filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Briggs Decl iso Application to Seal, #2 Proposed Order PO Granting Application to File Under Seal)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 36 ORDER RE STIPULATED PER STANDING ORDER: BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR JUNIPER'S MOTION TO DISMISS CORE'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. #35 by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the relief requested in the Stipulation is GRANTED. Core Optical Technologies, LLC shall file and serve its Opposition to Juniper Networks Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Core's Second Amended Complaint on or before 5/18/2020; and Juniper Networks Inc., shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Core's Second Amended Complaint on or before 6/8/2020. (jp) |
Filing 35 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File STIPULATED PER STANDING ORDER: BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #33 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulation on Briefing Schedule)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Resolution of Juniper's Motion to Dismiss Core's SAC filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities iso Motion to Stay, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Stay Discovery) (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 33 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/13/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities iso MTD SAC, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order, #3 Declaration Hefazi Declaration, #4 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 1, #5 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 2, #6 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 3, #7 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 4, #8 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 5, #9 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 6, #10 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 7, #11 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 8, #12 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 9, #13 Exhibit Hefazi Decl. Ex. 10) (Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 32 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DEEMING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT (DKT. #29 ) by Judge John A Kronstadt: In light of the Second Amended Complaint filed on March 27, 2020 (Dkt. #31 ), the Motion is found to be MOOT, and the hearing set for June 22, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. is vacated. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 31 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Amended Complaint/Petition,, #27 , filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 30 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File STIPULATED PER STANDING ORDER: BRIEFING SCHEDULE as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #29 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc..(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 29 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/22/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Juniper's Memorandum of Points and Authorities iso Motion to Dismiss FAC, #2 Declaration Declaration of Todd Briggs iso Motion to Dismiss FAC, #3 Exhibit Briggs Ex 1, #4 Exhibit Briggs Ex 2, #5 Exhibit Briggs Ex 3, #6 Exhibit Briggs Ex 4, #7 Exhibit Briggs Ex 5, #8 Exhibit Briggs Ex 6, #9 Exhibit Briggs Ex 7, #10 Exhibit Briggs Ex 8, #11 Exhibit Briggs Ex 9, #12 Exhibit Briggs Ex 10) (Johnson, Kevin) |
Filing 28 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc., identifying Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Johnson, Kevin) |
Filing 27 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20)(Underwood, Stephen) |
Filing 26 ORDER Re Joint Stipulation on First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #25 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is therefore GRANTED, and Plaintiff Core Optical shall file and serve its First Amended Complaint on or before 2/21/2020. Defendant Juniper Networks shall file and serve an Answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint on or before 3/6/2020. (jp) |
Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation on FAC)(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 24 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The First Amended Complaint is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (cw) |
Filing 23 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (cw) |
Filing 22 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, (LaPorte, Lawrence) |
Filing 21 NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 8:19-cv-02189 JAK (RAOx). (esa) |
Filing 20 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#20-009) approved by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. It is Ordered, with the concurrence of the Case Management and Assignment Committee, the the following case be reassigned from the calendar of Judge Andrew J. Guilford to the calendar of Judge Percy Anderson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-02189-PA-JPRx. (dv) |
Filing 19 **STRICKEN** FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , filed by plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit Exhibit 31)(Underwood, Stephen) Modified on 2/12/2020 (cw). |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance #13 , Notice of Appearance #15 , Notice of Appearance #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #16 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. Defendant shall have until and including February 3, 2020 to file its response to Plaintiffs Complaint. (es) |
Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 3, 2020 filed by Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Kevin) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ray R Zado on behalf of Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (Attorney Ray R Zado added to party Juniper Networks, Inc.(pty:dft))(Zado, Ray) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Todd M Briggs on behalf of Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (Attorney Todd M Briggs added to party Juniper Networks, Inc.(pty:dft))(Briggs, Todd) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Kevin P B Johnson on behalf of Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (Attorney Kevin P B Johnson added to party Juniper Networks, Inc.(pty:dft))(Johnson, Kevin) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, upon Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. served on 11/14/2019, answer due 12/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Albert Damonte, CT Corporation System Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 11 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 8:12-cv-01872 AG(JPRx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott and Judge James V. Selna to Judge Andrew J. Guilford and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 8:19-cv-02189 AG(JPRx). Signed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford (rn) |
Filing 10 INITIAL ORDER FOLLOWING FILING OF COMPLAINT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SELNA (lb) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Juniper Networks, Inc. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge James V. Selna and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. Related Case(s): 12-cv-1872; 16-cv-0437; 17-cv-0548 (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC, identifying Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Hadley, Lawrence) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24764016 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Core Optical Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18) (Attorney Lawrence M Hadley added to party Core Optical Technologies, LLC(pty:pla))(Hadley, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.