Pettibone v. Medtronic, Inc.
| Mr. Glen Pettibone |
| Medtronic, Inc. |
| 4:2021cv02599 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #14 Stipulation. Amended Pleadings due by 6/25/2021. Medtronic's Motion to Dismiss hearing set 6/22/2021 is VACATED. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2021)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Glen Pettibone, Medtronic, Inc. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 5/17/2021) Modified on 5/18/2021 (amd3S, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting #12 Stipulation. Replies due by 6/4/2021. Responses due by 5/21/2021. Motion Hearing set for 6/22/2021 02:00 PM before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint: Responses due by 5/21/2021. Replies due by 6/4/2021. Motion Hearing set for 6/22/2021 02:00 PM via Zoom Webinar Videoconference before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021) |
| Filing 12 Stipulated Proposed Scheduling Order Regarding Briefing Schedule for #5 Motion to Dismiss filed by Glen Pettibone, Medtronic, Inc. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/27/2021) Modified on 4/28/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 4/26/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Medtronic, Inc... (Gaus, Edward) (Filed on 4/22/2021) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Glen Pettibone.. (Birka-White, David) (Filed on 4/22/2021) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 4/23/2021. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
| Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING MOTION HEARING. According to Local Rule 7, motions must be noticed for a hearing not less than 35 days from filing. Due to the recent filing of #5 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, the court resets the hearing date from 5/21/2021 to 5/27/2021 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or v ideoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Medtronic, Inc. Motion Hearing set for 5/21/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 4/30/2021. Replies due by 5/7/2021. (Gaus, Edward) (Filed on 4/16/2021) Modified on 4/16/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Medtronic, Inc. re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, (Gaus, Edward) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 7/1/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/8/2021 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/23/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court of California. Their case number is C21-00471. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15818979). Filed by Medtronic, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaus, Edward) (Filed on 4/9/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pettibone v. Medtronic, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Medtronic, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Edward Bohatch Gaus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mr. Glen Pettibone | |
| Represented By: | David Michael Birka-White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
