Valenzuela-Martin v. Bardini et al
| Alejandro Valenzuela-Martin and Alejandro Valenzuela Martin |
| Emilia M. Bardini, David W. Jennings and Alejandro Mayorkas |
| 3:2021cv02608 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order. Signed 5/24/2021 by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #10 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings. Case Management Statement due by 10/1/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/8/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be by Zoom Webinar and could be subject to change. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Stay Proceedings; and [Proposed] Order filed by Emilia M. Bardini, David W. Jennings, Alejandro Mayorkas. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 5/21/2021) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Emilia M. Bardini, David W. Jennings, Alejandro Mayorkas.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 5/21/2021) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alejandro Valenzuela Martin. All Defendants. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 4/14/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Alejandro Valenzuela Martin (SUMMONS; COMPLAINT; CIVIL COVER SHEET; EXHIBITS OF RECORD; IMMIGRATION MANDAMUS PROCEDURAL ORDER; STANDING ORDERS FOR ALL JUDGES OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA; CIVIL STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO, COVID-19 STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO; CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JURISDICTION) (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 4/14/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Alejandro Valenzuela Martin.. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
| Filing 5 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Emilia M. Bardini, David W. Jennings, Alejandro Mayorkas. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 4/9/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus and under Administrative Procedure Act, with excerpts of record against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15820071.). Filed byAlejandro Mayorkas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Excerpts of Record)(Crabtree, Kevin) (Filed on 4/9/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
