Maravilla v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.
| Juan Maravilla |
| Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv02628 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Juan Maravilla of SUMMONS (Nunley, Cimone) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
Filing 12
ORDER. The parties' stipulated protective order is approved, except that in those cases where the stipulated protective order conflicts with the Court's standing orders (e.g., with respect to the filing of discovery motions), the Court's standing orders will control. Signed by Judge James Donato on 5/20/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2021)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Juan Maravilla. (Nunley, Cimone) (Filed on 5/17/2021) |
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/22/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 7/15/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 4/28/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 4/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc... (Cruse, Octovia) (Filed on 4/26/2021) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. re 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #5 Certificate of Interested Entities (Cruse, Octovia) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. identifying other affiliate Balfour Beatty, LLC, for Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (Cruse, Octovia) (Filed on 4/13/2021) Modified on 4/14/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Balfour Beatty, LLC for Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (Cruse, Octovia) (Filed on 4/13/2021) Modified on 4/14/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 7/14/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/21/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021) |
| #1 Answer to Removal Complaint by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 4/26/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (with Jury demand by plaintiff) from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-21-590514. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15825996). Filed by Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration of Mark Prude, #3 Declaration of Mark Birch, #4 Declaration of Angel Sevilla)(Sween, Lisa) (Filed on 4/12/2021) Modified on 4/13/2021 (cjlS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
