Spillard v. Tigar
Plaintiff: Everett L Spillard, II
Defendant: District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar
Case Number: 3:2021cv02648
Filed: April 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: PSLC CET
Referring Judge: Edward M Chen
2 Judge: Jon S Tigar
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2021 Filing 13 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/24/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 21, 2021 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Everett L Spillard, II. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2021)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 5/14/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
May 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN THIS CASE. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/14/2021. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Copy placed in O:Drive on 5/14/2021.
May 13, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Everett L Spillard, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2021)
April 30, 2021 Filing 6 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for all further proceedings. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 4/30/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 30, 2021 Mailed Notice of Assignment #6 to plaintiff at CMF.(ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/30/2021) Modified on 5/5/2021 (ljf, COURT STAFF).
April 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REASSIGNMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 29, 2021. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 15, 2021 Filing 3 **PLEASE DISREGARD ENTRY*DOCKETED IN ERROR** Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 34611153923. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2021) Modified on 4/22/2021 (haS, COURT STAFF).
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 5/21/2021. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
April 13, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, Recusal and to Compel the Judge to Give Notice on Any and All Rulings Before His Court (FEE NOT PAID). Filed by Everett L Spillard, II. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2021) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/21/2021: #2 Signed Petition) (jmlS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spillard v. Tigar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Everett L Spillard, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: District Court Judge Jon S. Tigar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?