Love v. Patel et al
| Samuel Love |
| Bimalkumar M Patel and Sharmila B Patel |
| 3:2021cv02833 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Clerk's Notice of ENTRY OF DEFAULT against Defendant Sharmila B. Patel. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry) (Related documents(s) #12 )(tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021) |
| Filing 13 Clerk's Notice of ENTRY OF DEFAULT against Defendant Bimalkumar M. Patel. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry) (Related documents(s) #11 )(tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST For Entry of Default (as to Sharmila B Patel only filed by Samuel Love. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gutierrez, Faythe) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for Entry of Default (as to Bimalkumar M. Patel only) filed by Samuel Love. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gutierrez, Faythe) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Faythe E. Gutierrez (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gutierrez, Faythe) (Filed on 6/1/2021) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Love. Bimalkumar M Patel served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 5/7/2021) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Love. Sharmila B Patel served on 5/5/2021, answer due 5/26/2021. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 5/7/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Samuel Love.. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 4/25/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendants Bimalkumar M Patel, Sharmila B Patel. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/4/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons (Civil L.R. 3-15) filed by Samuel Love re #1 Complaint (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief for Violations Of: Americans With Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-15859206). Filed by Samuel Love. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Handy, Russell) (Filed on 4/20/2021) Modified on 4/21/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
