Pomponio v. Alamo Cafe, Inc. et al
Meryl Pomponio |
Jose Arredondo doing business as Alamo Cafe, Alamo Cafe, Inc. doing business as Alamo Cafe and Arthur L. Anderson |
3:2021cv02834 |
April 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Charles R Breyer |
American with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meryl Pomponio. Jose Arredondo served on 5/7/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Malakauskas, Daniel) (Filed on 5/31/2021) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meryl Pomponio. Arthur L. Anderson served on 5/7/2021, answer due 5/28/2021. (Malakauskas, Daniel) (Filed on 5/31/2021) |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2021) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Alamo Cafe, Inc., Arthur L. Anderson, and Jose Arredondo. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2021 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco - To be determined.If this action seeks accommodation or other relief, including attorney fees,pursuant to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC 12191-89, the court directs, pursuant to FRCP 16, the following:a. Each plaintiff shall, pursuant to FRCP 4 (m), forthwith completeservice on any unserved defendant;b. Discovery, except for initial disclosures required by FRCP 26 (a), andall other proceedings are STAYED;c. If not previously done, each plaintiff shall forthwith serve upon eachdefendant a demand for accommodation and statement of attorney feesincurred to date (42 USC 12205; Hensly v Eckerhart, 461 US 424,429-30, 433-37 (1983));d. Each defendant shall, no later than the date for the conference of theparties specified above, serve a response to the demand foraccommodation;e. The joint case management statement shall contain, in addition to theinformation called for by FRCP 26 (f), the information set forth inparagraphs c and d. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/4/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Meryl Pomponio (Malakauskas, Daniel) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Malakauskas, Daniel) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15859564.). Filed byMeryl Pomponio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Malakauskas, Daniel) (Filed on 4/20/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.