Foster v. CDCR
| Michael Barkarri Foster |
| CDCR |
| 3:2021cv02956 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC MWD |
| William H Orrick |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Updated plaintiff's address per letter #9 and mailed copy of docket sheet to plaintiff at CSP-SAC, noting that any Clerk's Notices of filing deficiencies and all court orders will be sent to him in writing at the address located on the docket sheet. (ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2021) |
| Filing 9 LETTER dated 6/6/21 from Michael Barkarri Foster. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2021) |
| Filing 8 LETTER dated 5/24/21 from Michael Foster. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 7
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Signed by the Clerk on 5/27/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 5 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Barkarri Foster. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2021) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 6/1/2021. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael Barkarri Foster. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CDCR. Filed by Michael Barkarri Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Foster v. CDCR | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Barkarri Foster | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CDCR | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
