Wilson, M.D. et al v. Monsanto Company
| Charles S. Wilson, M.D. and Linda Wilson |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2021cv03414 |
| May 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [Plaintiffs Charles Wilson, M.D., et al.] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [Plaintiffs Charles Wilson, M.D., et al.] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
| Filing 10 Monsanto Company's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [Plaintiffs Charles Wilson, M.D., et al.] byMonsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Nebraska; Case Number 8:21-cv-00164. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2741: District of Nebraska (Omaha), 8:21-cv-00164-JFB-SMB, Wilson, M.D. et al v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-03414-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 267 cc: JPMDL (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2021) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER. Case is transferred to USDC-Northern District of California, Docket No. 2741. (Attachments: #1 Letter via E-mail) (MKR) |
| Filing 7 COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER from the Multidistrict Litigation Panel. Clerk to wait for certified copy of order to transfer the file to USDC- Northern District of California, Docket No. 2741. (MKR) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. Original electronic file sent. (MKR) |
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Agreed Motion to Stay. All proceedings in this case are stayed pending transfer to MDL No. 2741, In re Roundup Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 3:16-md-02741-VC (N.D. Cal). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. (LRH)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER by Clerk regarding Notice of Removal #1 with copy of docket sheet to Multidistrict Litigation Panel Office. (LRM) |
| Filing 4 TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis assigned. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(2), the parties are notified that, if all parties consent, a magistrate judge may conduct a civil action or proceeding, including a jury or nonjury trial, subject to the courts rules and policies governing the assignment of judges in civil cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 73; NEGenR 1.4. (LRM) |
| Filing 3 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay by Attorney Michael K. Huffer on behalf of Defendant Monsanto Company.(Huffer, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Request for Location of Trial by Attorney Michael K. Huffer on behalf of Defendant Monsanto Company (Huffer, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against Linda Wilson, Charles S. Wilson, M.D. from District Court of Lancaster County, Case number CI 21-1078 ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANEDC-4382552) with attached state court pleadings, by Attorney Michael K. Huffer on behalf of Monsanto Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Huffer, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
