Adams v. United Airlines, Inc.
| Chaz Adams |
| United Airlines, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv03809 |
| May 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 8/12/202 1. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/19/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/3/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by United Airlines, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Airlines Holding, Inc. for United Airlines, Inc.. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.S CERTIFICATION OF INTERESTED ENTITIES (Gehrke, Michele) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL DEFENDANT UNITED AIRLINES, INC.'S NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-20-588015. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-15991652). Filed byUnited Airlines, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Dorota Karpierz, #2 Declaration of Michele Haydel Gehrke, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gehrke, Michele) (Filed on 5/20/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adams v. United Airlines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Airlines, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michele Haydel Gehrke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chaz Adams | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth N. Frucht |
| Represented By: | Frederick J. Geonetta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
