C. et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
Parent/Guardian Stacey Beauchamp, A. C., A.C. and Stacey Beauchamp |
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Adam Bowen, Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Riaz Valani, eLiquitech, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Nicholas Pritzker, JUUL Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM INC., Altria Group, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Hoyoung Huh, Circle K Stores Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc. and Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc. |
3:2021cv04026 |
May 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Adam Bowen, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Circle K Stores Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc, Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs, Inc., James Monsees, McLane Company, Inc., Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Riaz Valani, Tobacco Technology, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. E-filer is reminded that aliases should be entered in the alias field and not as part of the name. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further a ction is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Stacey Beauchamp, A.C. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2021) |
DIRECT FILE MEMBER CASE OPENED: MDL 2913, A.C. et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 21-cv-04026-WHO cc: JPMDL (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Cases associated: Create association to 3:19-md-02913-WHO. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adam Bowen, Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services LLC, Altria Enterprises LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Circle K Stores Inc., Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc, Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM INC., James Monsees, McLane Company, Inc., Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Riaz Valani, Tobacco Technology, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16015679.). Filed byStacey Beauchamp, A. C.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Biggs, Harrison) (Filed on 5/27/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.