Gonzalez v. Lending Club Corporation et al
Alicia Gonzalez |
TransUnion, LLC and Lending Club Corporation |
3:2021cv04358 |
June 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Maxine M Chesney |
Sallie Kim |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Lending Club Corporation. (Nikdel, Susan) (Filed on 8/4/2021) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/17/2021 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/10/2021.. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 7/7/2021. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2021) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extending Time for Defendant LendingClub Corporation to Respond (Current Date: July 7, 2021; New Date: August 5, 2021) filed by Lending Club Corporation. (Nikdel, Susan) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 7/1/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by TransUnion, LLC.. (Miller, Debra) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint And Affirmative Defenses byTransUnion, LLC. (Miller, Debra) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 11 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Debra Miller. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/8/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2021) |
Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16110141.) filed by TransUnion, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Miller, Debra) (Filed on 6/24/2021) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by TransUnion, LLC identifying Corporate Parent T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., Corporate Parent TransUnion Intermediate Holdings, Inc. for TransUnion, LLC. (Streza, David) (Filed on 6/23/2021) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by David James Streza (Streza, David) (Filed on 6/23/2021) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alicia Gonzalez. Lending Club Corporation served on 6/14/2021, answer due 7/6/2021; TransUnion, LLC served on 6/14/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Apps, Stanley) (Filed on 6/15/2021) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lending Club Corporation, TransUnion, LLC. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2021) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/7/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2021) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Apps, Stanley) (Filed on 6/9/2021) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/22/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act against Lending Club Corporation, TransUnion, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16052918.). Filed byAlicia Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Apps, Stanley) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.