Appellation Trading Co., LLC v. Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC
Appellation Trading Co., LLC |
Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC |
3:2021cv04360 |
June 8, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Joseph C Spero |
Trademark |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Appellation Trading Company's ANSWER to Counterclaim , COUNTERCLAIM in Reply against Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC byAppellation Trading Co., LLC. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
Filing 18 Certificate of Interested Entities by Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC identifying Other Affiliate Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC for Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC. does not have a parent corporation, (Rutowski, Diana) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Appellation Trading Co., LLC. Service waived by Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC waiver sent on 6/30/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 16 Answer to Amended Complaint #12 Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, COUNTERCLAIM against Appellation Trading Co., LLC bySalvestrin Wine Co., LLC. (Rutowski, Diana) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana Rutowski (Rutowski, Diana) (Filed on 7/1/2021) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2021) |
Filing 13 Proposed Summons. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/21/2021) |
Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT (First) against Appellation Trading Co., LLC. Filed byAppellation Trading Co., LLC. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/21/2021) |
Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Appellation Trading Co., LLC (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/14/2021) |
Filing 10 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Case Management Statement due by 9/1/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/8/2021, 02:00 PM, by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Thursday, September 2, 2021, by no later than 10:00 a.m.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. p> (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2021) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 6/10/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2021) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2021) |
Filing 7 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Attachments: #1 complaint)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2021 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Appellation Trading Co., LLC.. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/22/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 2 MISCELLANEOUS MATTER: Proposed Summons (Filing fee $ 49.). Filed by Appellation Trading Co., LLC. (Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Relief against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16053236.). Filed byAppellation Trading Co., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reidl, Paul) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. The filing fee of $49 is not required for the proposed summons. Please submit a request for refund. Re: #2 Other Miscellaneous Matter filed by Ap pellation Trading Co., LLC (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Appellation Trading Co., LLC v. Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Salvestrin Wine Co., LLC | |
Represented By: | Diana Rutowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Appellation Trading Co., LLC | |
Represented By: | Paul William Reidl |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.