Diggs v. State of California et al
| Michael LaRoy Diggs |
| Patton State Hospital, County of Alameda, California Department of State Hospitals, Yok Choi, Allan Hymer, State of California, Armando Pastran, Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services, Napa State Hospital, Yvonne James, Janine Wallace, Mario Souza, Steve Mauer and Yvonne Jones |
| 3:2021cv04747 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| PSLC MBI |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Letter dated 7/29/2021 from Michael LaRoy Diggs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2021) |
| Filing 3 Letter dated 7/1/2021 from Michael LaRoy Diggs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Michael LaRoy Diggs. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alameda County Behavioral Health Care Services, California Department of State Hospitals, Yok Choi, County of Alameda, Allan Hymer, Yvonne James, Steve Mauer, Napa State Hospital, Armando Pastran, Patton State Hospital, Mario Souza, State of California, Janine Wallace (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Michael LaRoy Diggs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
