The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States
| The Fiscal Court of Mercer County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Clinton County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Logan County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Larue County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Todd County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Harrison County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Hart County Kentucky and The Fiscal Court of Caldwell County Kentucky |
| McKinsey & Company Inc United States and McKinsey & Company Inc. United States |
| 3:2021cv04957 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Kentucky Western; Case Number 3:21-cv-00326. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2996: Western District of Kentucky, 3:21-cv-00326-CHB, The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky et al v. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-04957-CRB pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 1 cc: JPMDL (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER No. 1 from ND/CA re: MDL 2996 (KJA) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT signed by Judge Claria Horn Boom on 6/16/21; granting #5 Motion to Stay. cc: Counsel(DJT)
|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings and Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint by Defendant McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order, #2 Exhibit B - Conditional Transfer Order, #3 Proposed Order) (Lockaby, Amanda) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Fiscal Court of Mercer County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Todd County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Clinton County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Caldwell County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Harrison County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Hart County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Larue County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Logan County Kentucky. McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States served on 5/27/2021, answer due 6/17/2021. (Johnson, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States. Counsel for Plaintiff is responsible for printing and serving the attached issued summons(es). (DJT) |
| Filing 2 Case Assignment (Random Selection): Case Assigned to Judge Claria Horn Boom. (DJT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0644-3347510, filed by The Fiscal Court of Mercer County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Clinton County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Mason County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Breathitt County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Caldwell County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Harrison County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Hart County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Larue County Kentucky, The Fiscal Court of Logan County Kentucky. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (DJT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
