Neumark v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
| Allen Neumark |
| Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC and Sony Group Corporation |
| 3:2021cv05031 |
| June 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #14 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Elizabeth Anne McKenna. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Peggy J. Wedgworth. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Elizabeth Anne McKenna ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16240041.) filed by Allen Neumark. (McKenna, Elizabeth) (Filed on 8/2/2021) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Peggy J. Wedgworth ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16239996.) filed by Allen Neumark. (Wedgworth, Peggy) (Filed on 8/2/2021) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Blake H. Yagman. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2021)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Blake H. Yagman ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number 0971-16239249.) filed by Allen Neumark. (Yagman, Blake) (Filed on 8/2/2021) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Case Management Statement is due by 9/23/2021. All parties shall appear by videoconference using log-in instructions the Court will provide in advance. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxsS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2021) |
| Case reassigned to Judge Richard Seeborg. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2021) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RELATING CASES 21-cv-03361-RS and 21-cv-05031-JSC. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 07/27/2021. (bxsS, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by August 2, 2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety in the lowest numbered case in accordance with the Local Rules. Re:[ 6] ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related (L.R. 3-12, 7-11) filed by Allen Neumark. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021) |
| Filing 7 Declaration of Alex Straus in Support of #6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related (L.R. 3-12, 7-11) filed byAllen Neumark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Class Action Complaint - Neumark v Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC)(Related document(s) #6 ) (Straus, Alex) (Filed on 7/16/2021) |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related (L.R. 3-12, 7-11) filed by Allen Neumark. Responses due by 7/20/2021. (Straus, Alex) (Filed on 7/16/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/23/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/30/2021 01:30 PM. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/14/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. E-filer is reminded to enter all parties as named in the Complaint. Sony Group Corporation has been entered on the docket. The County Code in the case opening screen has also been corrected to "US, Outside State" as it refers to plaintiff's county of residence. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Allen Neumark. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Straus, Alex) (Filed on 6/29/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16127680.). Filed byAllen Neumark. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Straus, Alex) (Filed on 6/29/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
