Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Apple Inc.
Defendant: Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv05110
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Susan van Keulen
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 Stipulation filed by Voip-Pal.com, Inc.. Answer due 9/7/2021. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
July 27, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER filed by Voip-Pal.com, Inc.. (Hudnell, Lewis) (Filed on 7/27/2021)
July 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings re #18 Order of Recusal. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2021)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/19/2021. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)
July 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 7/15/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 15, 2021 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 15 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER filed by Voip-Pal.com, Inc.. (Hudnell, Lewis) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Voip-Pal.com, Inc. (Hudnell, Lewis) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Lewis Emery Hudnell, III (Hudnell, Lewis) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 14, 2021 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Apple Inc... (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/14/2021)
July 13, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. served on 07/02/2021, answer due 7/23/21, filed by Apple Inc. (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/13/2021) Modified on 7/13/2021 (mclS, COURT STAFF).
July 13, 2021 #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. The correct event is SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED found under the Initial Pleadings and Service/Service of Process category. [ err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #11 Affidavit of Service filed by Apple Inc. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2021)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for all further proceedings RE #9 Order of Recusal. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2021)
July 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 7/2/2021. (svklc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Voip-Pal.com, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Ameet A. Modi (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 6 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Apple Inc. (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cvS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/15/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement and Invalidity against Voip-Pal.com, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16136368.). Filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(Modi, Ameet) (Filed on 7/1/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apple Inc. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
Represented By: Lewis Emery Hudnell, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apple Inc.
Represented By: Ameet A. Modi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?