Truong v. Amguard Insurance Company
| Thao Truong doing business as Megan's Nail Salon |
| Amguard Insurance Company |
| 3:2021cv05133 |
| July 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #25 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022)
|
| Filing 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Amguard Insurance Company, Thao Truong. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/25/2022) Modified on 7/25/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 24 Proposed Order Re Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice by Amguard Insurance Company. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/25/2022) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] The Correct Event is Stipulation and Proposed Order. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-f ile in its entirety. Re: #24 Proposed Order filed by Amguard Insurance Company. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2022) |
| Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. At the parties' request, the further case management conference scheduled for July 14, 2022 is continued to July 28, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. The conference will take place via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than noon on 7/27/2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2022) Modified on 7/12/2022 (ahm, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 22 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Amguard Insurance Company, Thao Truong. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/8/2022) Modified on 7/11/2022 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT. There is a case management conference scheduled for July 14, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. An updated case management conference was due on July 7, 2022. The parties shall either file their statement or request to continue the conference by 5:00 p.m. on July 8, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2022) |
|
Filing 20
Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 5/12/2022.(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 19
CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Please take notice a case management conference is scheduled for July 14, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley by Zoom videoconference. Updated statement is due by July 7, 2022. The Scheduling Order imposed by Judge Breyer remains in place. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/jsc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names must be sent to the CRD at jsccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 12:00 p.m. on July 6, 2022.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: # https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley for all further proceedings. Judge Charles R. Breyer no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Judge Clerk on 05/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2022)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/10/2022. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Protective Order filed by Amguard Insurance Company. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 5/10/2022) |
|
Filing 15
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Conference set for March 25, 2022 is vacated. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/15/2022 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. A Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/8/2022. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/17/2022. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2022)
|
| Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting Joint. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 3/16/2022) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE on October 22, 2021: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/18/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/25/2022 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
| Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting Joint Rule 26(f) Report. (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 11 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/15/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/22/2021 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2021) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Clerk on 7/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. REMINDER TO COUNSEL: Counsel is instructed that all future filings shall bear the initials DMR immediately after the case number. Re: #6 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge filed by Amguard Insurance Company, #7 Certificate of Service filed by Amguard Insurance Company (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Amguard Insurance Company (Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/8/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Amguard Insurance Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/8/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/29/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2021 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
| Answer to Removal Complaint filed on July 1, 2021 in Superior Court of California, County of Alameda by Amguard Insurance Company. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/16/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2021) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Amguard Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Foy, Matthew) (Filed on 7/2/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Amguard Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Amguard Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Thao Truong, Other Affiliate Megan's Nail Salon for Amguard Insurance Company. (Foy, Matthew) (Filed on 7/2/2021) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG21087151. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16140512). Filed byAmguard Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Zina Yu In Support of Removal, #2 Declaration of Sonia Pervez In Support of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Yu, Zina) (Filed on 7/2/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Truong v. Amguard Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amguard Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Zina Yu |
| Represented By: | Matthew Foy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thao Truong doing business as Megan's Nail Salon | |
| Represented By: | Mercedes A Gavin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
