Magee v. Cantil-Sakauye et al
Ruchell C. Magee |
Judge Cantil-Sakauye and Governor Gavin Newsom |
3:2021cv05432 |
July 15, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
PSLC MWD |
William H Orrick |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REQUEST/Affidavit Statement to Disqualify Judge filed by Ruchell C. Magee. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2021) |
Filing 5 Received Document: Supplement Complaint by Ruchell C. Magee. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
Filing 4 Response to #3 Order to Show Cause filed by Ruchell C. Magee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2021) |
Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Show Cause Response due by 9/1/2021. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/19/2021. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ruchell C. Magee. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cantil-Sakauye, Gavin Newsom (Filing fee: IFPP). Filed by Ruchell C. Magee. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/16/2021: #1 Exhibit -part 1, #2 Exhibit -part 2, #3 Envelope) (slhS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.