Gomez v. DTG Operations, Inc. et al
| Andres Gomez |
| DTG Operations, Inc. and The Hertz Corporation |
| 3:2021cv05611 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice by Andres Gomez (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/13/2021) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by DTG Operations, Inc., The Hertz Corporation.. (Launey, Kristina) (Filed on 8/16/2021) |
Filing 12
Order. Signed 8/12/2021 by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #10 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint.(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021)
|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 8/26/2021. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Complaint to Extend Time to Respond filed by DTG Operations, Inc., The Hertz Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Launey, Kristina) (Filed on 8/11/2021) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Gomez. The Hertz Corporation served on 7/30/2021, answer due 8/20/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Gomez. DTG Operations, Inc. served on 7/30/2021, answer due 8/20/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 8/5/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andres Gomez.. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 7/23/2021) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to DTG Operations, Inc., The Hertz Corporation. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/5/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Andres Gomez re #1 Complaint (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16204040.). Filed byAndres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Handy, Russell) (Filed on 7/22/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
