Raynaldo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronald Raynaldo
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Case Number: 4:2021cv05808
Filed: July 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint filed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc. and Ronald Raynaldo. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 8/20/2021) Modified on 8/23/2021 (bnsS, COURT STAFF).
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for November 2, 2021, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by October 26th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:21-cv-05808-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 08/06/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2021)
August 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ronald Raynaldo. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. served on 8/2/2021, answer due 8/23/2021. (Herkenhoff, Kathleen) (Filed on 8/3/2021)
July 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/25/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/1/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2021)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Summons Issued as to American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2021)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ronald Raynaldo.. (King, Laurence) (Filed on 7/29/2021)
July 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/12/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2021)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ronald Raynaldo (King, Laurence) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (King, Laurence) (Filed on 7/28/2021)
July 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Honda Motor Co., Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16227180.). Filed byRonald Raynaldo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-6, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(King, Laurence) (Filed on 7/28/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raynaldo v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Raynaldo
Represented By: Laurence D. King
Represented By: Kathleen A. Herkenhoff
Represented By: Michael D. Braun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Represented By: Amir M. Nassihi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?