Murphy-Richardson v. Shinn et al
| Ismael A. Murphy-Richardson |
| David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Superior Court of the State of Arizona |
| 3:2021cv06138 |
| August 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| PSLC MWD |
| Alex G Tse |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ismael A. Murphy-Richardson. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2021) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Petition on Form due by 9/27/2021. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Mailed notice #3 and blank petition to Petitioner at ASPC-Florence South.(ljf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2021). |
| Mailed copy of #2 to Petitioner. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2021) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00, receipt 44611017213). Filed by Ismael A. Murphy-Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Letter requesting transfer, #2 Letter requesting transfer, #3 Envelope, #4 Envelope, #5 Receipt)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
