Drake v. Sysco San Francisco, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: ERIC DRAKE
Defendant: SYSCO SAN FRANCISCO, INC. and SYSCO CORPORATION
Case Number: 3:2021cv06282
Filed: August 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2021 Filing 9 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/15/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/15/2021. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2021)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RELATING CASE to 21-cv-06280-SK. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 8/31/2021. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2021)
August 31, 2021 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/14/2021. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2021)
August 31, 2021 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2021)
August 16, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, 2 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Jang, Scott) (Filed on 8/16/2021)
August 16, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/11/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General O rder 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. (slhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2021)
August 16, 2021 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Sysco Corporation, Corporate Parent Sysco San Francisco, Inc. for Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Jang, Scott) (Filed on 8/16/2021)
August 16, 2021 Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Sysco Corporation, Corporate Parent Sysco San Francisco, Inc. for Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Jang, Scott) (Filed on 8/16/2021)
August 16, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/30/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2021)
August 13, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is RG21102653. (Filing fee $402; receipt number 0971-16284511). Filed by Sysco Corporation, Sysco San Francisco, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Cheri Neaylon, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jang, Scott) (Filed on 8/13/2021) Modified on 8/16/2021 (slhS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Drake v. Sysco San Francisco, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIC DRAKE
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYSCO SAN FRANCISCO, INC.
Represented By: Scott Philip Jang
Represented By: Trey Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SYSCO CORPORATION
Represented By: Scott Philip Jang
Represented By: Trey Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?