Lindblad v. Presidio Trust Board et al
Plaintiff: Robert Lindblad
Defendant: Presidio Trust Board, Presidio Officer's Club, Deb Haaland, Marie Louisa Hurabiell, Thomas B. Fargo, City of San Francisco, U.S. Govt., Tennessee Valley Authority, British Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency and Presidio Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv06806
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying #21 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 28, 2021 Filing 21 MOTION for misc relief filed by Robert Lindblad. Responses due by 11/12/2021. Replies due by 11/19/2021. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
October 24, 2021 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE Fee Past Due Notice. A notice of appeal was filed with this Court on October 12, 2021. The Court has revoked your in forma pauperis status. The docketing fee of $505 is due. Please send the fee to this office immediately. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 22, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Robert Lindblad. Appeal of Amended Order, #10 , Amended Judgment, #11 (Filing Fee IFP was previously granted with the Court, docket no. 3). (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2021)
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF'S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL re #16 . The Clerk of the Court is ordered to notify the Ninth Circuit immediately of this determination. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/19/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 14, 2021 Filing 17 Letter from Robert Lindblad. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 16 Referral Notice re #14 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit. USCA Case Number 21-16693. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 15 USCA Case Number 21-16693 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for #14 Notice of Appeal to the Ninth Circuit filed by Robert Lindblad. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
October 12, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Robert Lindblad. Appeal of AMENDED JUDGMENT, #11 (IFP Request was previously #3 Granted). USCA Case Number 21-16693 (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2021) Modified on 10/14/2021 (ecgS, COURT STAFF).
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying #12 Motion to Reassign Case. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 29, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION to Reassign Cases filed by Robert Lindblad. Responses due by 10/13/2021. Replies due by 10/20/2021. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 27, 2021 Filing 11 AMENDED JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 23, 2021 Filing 9 OBJECTION to #3 Report and Recommendations by Robert Lindblad. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2021)
September 23, 2021 Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 9/8/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 7, 2021 Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint filed by Robert Lindblad; ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Lindblad. Objections due by 9/21/2021. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 9/7/2021. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Robert Lindblad. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2021)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. IFPP. No Process. Filed by Robert Lindblad. Consent/Declination due by 9/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lindblad v. Presidio Trust Board et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Lindblad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Presidio Trust Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Presidio Officer's Club
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deb Haaland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marie Louisa Hurabiell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas B. Fargo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of San Francisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Govt.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tennessee Valley Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: British Intelligence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Presidio Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?