Verkada, Inc. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc. et al
| Verkada, Inc. |
| Motorola Solutions, Inc., Avigilon Corporation, Avigilon Fortress Corporation, Avigilon Patent Holding 1 Corporation and Avigilon Technologies Corporation |
| 3:2021cv06858 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER. In light of the stay, Dkt. No. 12, the initial case management conference set for December 9, 2021, is vacated. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/3/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2021)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Plaintiffs motion to stay, Dkt. No. 11, is granted and the case is administratively closed. The parties are directed to promptly advise the Court of any developments in the ITC investigation. Signed by Judge James Donato on 10/5/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659 (Unopposed) filed by Verkada, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/18/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor before Judge James Donato. Responses due by 10/15/2021. Replies due by 10/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pak, Sean) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
|
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/9/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 12/2/2021. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/9/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 9/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Verkada, Inc... (Pak, Sean) (Filed on 9/6/2021) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Entities by Verkada, Inc. (Pak, Sean) (Filed on 9/6/2021) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jodie W. Cheng on behalf of Plaintiff Verkada, Inc. (Cheng, Jodie) (Filed on 9/6/2021) |
| Filing 4 Erroneous Entry--Please Ignore CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING THE FILING OF ANACTION REGARDING A COPYRIGHT. The provisions of17 U.S.C. 508 require the submission of a report to theRegister of Copyrights. Please e-file a proposed Report onthe Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regardinga Copyright form AO 121 using the event Civil Events Other Filings Other Documents Copyright, within fivedays of this notice.. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021) Modified on 9/3/2021 (msrS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2021 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (msrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/17/2021. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16353203.). Filed byVerkada, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pak, Sean) (Filed on 9/2/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
