Pegasus Solar, Inc. v. Unirac, Inc.
| Pegasus Solar, Inc. |
| Unirac, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv06933 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Refund Status re #13 Application for Refund Declined. (rghS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021) |
| Filing 13 Application for Refund, Receipt Number 0971-16364241 by Pegasus Solar, Inc.. (Fisher, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Pegasus Solar, Inc. re #10 Case Management Scheduling Order, Proof of Service of CM Conference Order in Reassigned Case, Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California Contents of Joint Case Management Statement; Civil Standing Order General; and Civil Standing Order Discovery (Callaway, Daniel) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Strickland for UNIRAC, Inc. (Strickland, Andrew) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/14/2021 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/7/2021. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/27/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2021)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by e Clerk on 9/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2021)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2021) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Pegasus Solar, Inc... (Fisher, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/21/2021) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Pegasus Solar, Inc.. Service waived by Unirac, Inc. waiver sent on 9/13/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. (Fisher, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/17/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Unirac, Inc.. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2021 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/21/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Callaway, Daniel) (Filed on 9/7/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Complaint For Declaratory Judgment; Demand for Jury Trial against Unirac, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16364241.). Filed byPegasus Solar, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Callaway, Daniel) (Filed on 9/7/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pegasus Solar, Inc. v. Unirac, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pegasus Solar, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Chilton Callaway |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey M. Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Unirac, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Strickland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
