United States of America v. Approximately $32,300 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Approximately $32,300 in US Currency and Approximately $32,300 in U.S. Currency
Case Number: 3:2021cv06950
Filed: September 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date October 12, 2012. (Declaration of Publication) (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
September 10, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #1 Complaint, #3 Notice (Other), #5 Warrant Issued (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/10/2021)
September 8, 2021 Filing 5 Warrant of Arrest of Property In Rem Issued as to Approximately $32,300 in US Currency. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021)
September 8, 2021 Filing 4 Proposed Warrant. (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/8/2021)
September 8, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by United States of America (Notice of Forfeiture Action) (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/8/2021)
September 8, 2021 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/22/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2021)
September 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Verified Complaint for Civil Forfeiture in Rem) against Approximately $32,300 in US Currency. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/8/2021) Modified on 9/8/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately $32,300 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Chris Kaltsas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $32,300 in US Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Approximately $32,300 in U.S. Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?