Gomez v. Corro et al
Plaintiff: Andres Gomez
Defendant: Paulo Corro and Arturo Ramirez
Case Number: 3:2021cv07085
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andres Gomez. Paulo Corro served on 10/6/2021, answer due 10/27/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/9/2021)
November 5, 2021 Filing 12 Statement re #6 Summons Issued Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer by Paulo Corro, Arturo Ramirez. (Sahelian, Ara) (Filed on 11/5/2021)
October 28, 2021 Filing 11 Statement re #6 Summons Issued Stipulation to Extend Time to File an Answer by Paulo Corro. (Sahelian, Ara) (Filed on 10/28/2021)
September 16, 2021 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON REASSIGNMENT: Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/11/2022. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/18/2022 at 02:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 01, 17th Floor. (ecS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.Signed by the Clerk on 9/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
September 16, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2021)
September 15, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Andres Gomez.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/15/2021)
September 14, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Paulo Corro, Arturo Ramirez. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021)
September 14, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (elyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021)
September 14, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/28/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021)
September 13, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 9/13/2021)
September 13, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Andres Gomez re #1 Complaint (Handy, Russell) (Filed on 9/13/2021)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16385981.). Filed byAndres Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Handy, Russell) (Filed on 9/13/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gomez v. Corro et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andres Gomez
Represented By: Russell Clive Handy
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr.
Represented By: Zachary Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paulo Corro
Represented By: Ara Sahelian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arturo Ramirez
Represented By: Ara Sahelian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?