Kristi Stachowicz, v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
Kristi Stachowicz |
JUUL Labs, Inc. previously doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Enterprises, LLC, James Monsees, Adam Bowen, Nicholas Pritzker, Hoyoung Huh, Riaz Valani, Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Tobacco Technology, Inc., eLiquitech, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC and Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc. |
3:2021cv07103 |
September 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Alternative Ingredients, Inc., Altria Client Services, LLC, Altria Enterprises, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, Altria Group, Inc., Adam Bowen, Core-Mark Holding Company, Inc., Eby-Brown Company, LLC, Hoyoung Huh, JUUL Labs, Inc., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Mother Murphy's Labs, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc., Nicholas Pritzker, Tobacco Technology, Inc., Riaz Valani, eLiquitech, Inc.. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021) |
Filing 4 Case reassigned to Judge Judge William H. Orrick. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021) |
Filing 3 Docked in Error. See Docket # 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/28/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021) Modified on 9/14/2021 (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kraft, Kristine) (Filed on 9/14/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16388014.). Filed byKristi Stachowicz, individually and as the mother and next friend of M.R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kraft, Kristine) (Filed on 9/14/2021) |
MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2913: Kristi Stachowicz, v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-07103-WHO cc: JPMDL (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.