Whitaker v. Ko et al
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Defendant: Danny Ko, Hong Yuan Liu, Peter B. W. Ko, Linda Chan Ko and A And A Restaurant Group Inc
Case Number: 3:2021cv07200
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Referring Judge: Edward M Chen
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2021 Filing 16 STIPULATION EXTENDING DEFENDANTS DANNY KO, HONG YUAN LIU, PETER B. W. KO, LINDA CHAN KO, and A AND A RESTAURANT GROUP INC.s DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT filed by Peter B. W. Ko, A And A Restaurant Group Inc, Danny Ko, Linda Chan Ko, Hong Yuan Liu. (Scheg, Nathan) (Filed on 10/26/2021)
October 22, 2021 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. A And A Restaurant Group Inc served on 10/22/2021, answer due 11/12/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/22/2021)
October 18, 2021 Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Linda Chan Ko served on 10/18/2021, answer due 11/8/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/18/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Danny Ko served on 10/7/2021, answer due 10/28/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Peter B. W. Ko served on 10/7/2021, answer due 10/28/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brian Whitaker. Hong Yuan Liu served on 10/7/2021, answer due 10/28/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER IN REASSIGNED CASE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Joint Case Management Statement due by 4/12/2022. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/23/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2021)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M. Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 9/22/21. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2021)
September 21, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2021)
September 20, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brian Whitaker.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/20/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Defendants Peter B. W. Ko, A And A Restaurant Group Inc, Danny Ko, Linda Chan Ko, Hong Yuan Liu. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (tnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/1/2021. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 2 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons (Civil L.R. 3-15) by Brian Whitaker re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/17/2021)
September 17, 2021 Filing 1 Complaint For Damages And Injunctive Relief For Violations Of: Americans With Disabilities Act; Unruh Civil Rights Act against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number 0971-16400112). Filed by Brian Whitaker. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 9/17/2021) Modified on 9/17/2021 (tnS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitaker v. Ko et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Whitaker
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Prathima Reddy Price
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danny Ko
Represented By: Nathan Lawrence Scheg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hong Yuan Liu
Represented By: Nathan Lawrence Scheg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peter B. W. Ko
Represented By: Nathan Lawrence Scheg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Chan Ko
Represented By: Nathan Lawrence Scheg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A And A Restaurant Group Inc
Represented By: Nathan Lawrence Scheg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?