Wilson v. Delta Star, Inc.
Max Wilson |
Delta Star, Inc. |
3:2021cv07326 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 REPLY (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed byMax Wilson. (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 11/10/2021) |
Filing 12 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #10 MOTION to Remand ) filed byDelta Star, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Olga Savage, #2 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice iso Opposition to Motion to Remand)(Paetkau, Tyler) (Filed on 11/4/2021) |
Filing 11 CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING. Motion Hearing #10 MOTION to Remand set for 12/2/2021 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Pe rsons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entr y.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2021) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of MOTION and MOTION to Remand Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1447; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof filed by Max Wilson. Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2021 at 9:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 11/3/2021. Replies due by 11/10/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Talia Lux in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447, #2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447)(Lux, Talia) (Filed on 10/20/2021) Modified on 10/21/2021 (jlgS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Delta Star, Inc... (Paetkau, Tyler) (Filed on 10/5/2021) |
Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Max Wilson (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Max Wilson.. (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Talia Lux (Lux, Talia) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Delta Star, Inc. Additional Initial Documents (Paetkau, Tyler) (Filed on 9/22/2021) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/16/20 21. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/23/2021 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2021) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/5/2021. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2021) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Delta Star, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Delta Star, Inc. for Delta Star, Inc.. (Paetkau, Tyler) (Filed on 9/20/2021) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court for the County of San Mateo. Their case number is 21-civ-04448. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16410399). Filed byDelta Star, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Paetkau, Tyler) (Filed on 9/20/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Wilson v. Delta Star, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Max Wilson | |
Represented By: | Douglas Han |
Represented By: | Shunt Tatavos-Gharajeh |
Represented By: | Talia Lux |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Delta Star, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Tyler Mark Paetkau |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.