Farrales v. Ford Motor Company
Eddy Farrales |
Ford Motor Company |
4:2021cv07624 |
September 29, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Haywood S Gilliam |
Sallie Kim |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 50 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re Docket No. #49 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/14/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2022) |
Filing 49 NOTICE by Eddy Farrales of Settlement (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 9/14/2022) |
Filing 48 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #39 motion to dismiss filings under submission. The case management conference and the hearing on the motion previously scheduled for August 18, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. are vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022) |
Filing 47 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Updated) filed by Ford Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 8/11/2022) |
Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #26 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022) |
CASE REFERRED to Private ADR. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022) |
Filing 45 REPLY (re #39 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 6/28/2022) |
Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #43 Stipulation Re Docket No. #39 . (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
Reset Deadlines as to #39 MOTION to Dismiss, See Docket No. #44 : Replies due by 6/28/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2022) |
Filing 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
Filing 42 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the hearing on the pending #39 motion to dismiss, previously set for November 17, 2022, is advanced to August 18, 2022. The initial case management conference, previously set for June 21, 2022, is continued to August 18, 2022. The hearing on the motion and the case management conference will be held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022) |
Filing 41 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Ford Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 6/14/2022) |
Filing 40 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #39 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 6/14/2022) |
Filing 39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 11/17/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/14/2022. Replies due by 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 5/31/2022) |
Filing 38 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company. Filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 5/17/2022) Modified text on 5/17/2022 (dhm, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING #12 MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING #21 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Amended Pleadings due by 5/18/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2022) |
Set Deadline/Hearing, See Docket No. #37 : Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2022 and Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2022 02:00 PM The June 21st proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2022) |
Filing 36 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #21 motion for judgment on the pleadings filings under submission. The hearing previously scheduled for April 21, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2022) |
Filing 35 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. #21 . Notice is hereby given that the hearing on the motion set for April 21, 2022 will be held in-person before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022) |
Filing 34 CLERK'S NOTICE: You are hereby notified that the hearing set for 3/17/2022 re: #12 motion to remand and initial case management conference is vacated. Court finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2022) |
Filing 33 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. 30. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference and the hearing on the motion set for March 17, 2022 will be held telephonically. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022) |
Filing 32 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 3/9/2022) |
Filing 31 REPLY (re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 2/23/2022) |
Filing 30 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Initial Case Management Conference and the hearing on the #12 Motion to Remand previously set for March 17, 2022 will be held on this date at 1:00 p.m. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the parties will be advised closer to the hearing whether it will take place telephonically or in person. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022) |
Filing 29 Request for Judicial Notice re #28 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byEddy Farrales. (Related document(s) #28 ) (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 1/26/2022) |
Filing 28 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 1/26/2022) |
Filing 27 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING Dkt. No. #25 the parties' stipulation regarding the briefing schedule on Dkt. No. #21 Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court finds that there is good cause to modify the briefing schedule. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall respond to the motion on or before January 26, 2022, and Defendant shall file the reply in support of the motion on or before February 23, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2021) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Eddy Farrales filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/24/2021) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Requesting Change in Briefing Schedule filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/24/2021) |
Filing 24 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/23/2021) |
Filing 23 Certificate of Interested Entities by Eddy Farrales (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/23/2021) |
Filing 22 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/23/2021) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 4/21/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 1/5/2022. Replies due by 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/22/2021) |
Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference, previously set for January 4, 2022, is continued to March 17, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., to be held along with the hearing on the #12 motion to remand. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021) |
Filing 19 OBJECTIONS to re #15 Opposition/Response to Motion by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/16/2021) |
Filing 18 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Remand ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/16/2021) |
Filing 17 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2021) |
Filing 16 Request for Judicial Notice re #15 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #15 ) (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/3/2021) |
Filing 15 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Remand ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amir Nassihi, #2 Exhibit A)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/3/2021) |
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #13 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's #12 Motion to Remand. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
Reset Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Remand, See Docket No. #14 : Responses due by 12/3/2021 and Replies due by 12/17/2021. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Remand filed by Eddy Farrales. Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 11/12/2021. Replies due by 11/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chae, Larry) (Filed on 10/29/2021) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #7 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, #9 Order Reassigning Case,, Case Assigned/Reassigned, (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/18/2021) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for January 4, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by December 28th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:21-cv-07624-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by The Clerk on 10/14/21. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/13/2021) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re 1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities,, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #3 Notice (Other) (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/30/2021) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/13/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company to the United States District Court that Notice of Removal of Action has been Filed in State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/29/2021) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Corporate Parent State Street Corporation (parent of State Street Bank and Trust Company, which is the trustee of the Ford defined contribution plans), Corporate Parent Evercore Trust Company, N.A. (fiduciary of the Ford defined contribution plan), Corporate Parent Black Rock, Inc. and certain affiliates, Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group and certain affiliates for Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/29/2021) |
Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byFord Motor Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Farrales v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eddy Farrales | |
Represented By: | Larry Chae |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Amir M. Nassihi |
Represented By: | Rodrigo Enrique Salas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.