Farrales v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Eddy Farrales
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 4:2021cv07624
Filed: September 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Haywood S Gilliam
Referring Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 50 CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re Docket No. #49 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 9/14/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2022)
September 14, 2022 Filing 49 NOTICE by Eddy Farrales of Settlement (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 9/14/2022)
August 17, 2022 Filing 48 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #39 motion to dismiss filings under submission. The case management conference and the hearing on the motion previously scheduled for August 18, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. are vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2022)
August 11, 2022 Filing 47 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT (Updated) filed by Ford Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 8/11/2022)
July 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #26 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022)
July 15, 2022 CASE REFERRED to Private ADR. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2022)
June 28, 2022 Filing 45 REPLY (re #39 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 6/28/2022)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #43 Stipulation Re Docket No. #39 . (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2022)
June 22, 2022 Reset Deadlines as to #39 MOTION to Dismiss, See Docket No. #44 : Replies due by 6/28/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2022)
June 21, 2022 Filing 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 6/21/2022)
June 15, 2022 Filing 42 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the hearing on the pending #39 motion to dismiss, previously set for November 17, 2022, is advanced to August 18, 2022. The initial case management conference, previously set for June 21, 2022, is continued to August 18, 2022. The hearing on the motion and the case management conference will be held before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2022)
June 14, 2022 Filing 41 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Ford Motor Company. (Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 6/14/2022)
June 14, 2022 Filing 40 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #39 MOTION to Dismiss ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 6/14/2022)
May 31, 2022 Filing 39 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 11/17/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 6/14/2022. Replies due by 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Salas, Rodrigo) (Filed on 5/31/2022)
May 17, 2022 Filing 38 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Ford Motor Company. Filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 5/17/2022) Modified text on 5/17/2022 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING #12 MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING #21 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS. Amended Pleadings due by 5/18/2022. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2022)
April 27, 2022 Set Deadline/Hearing, See Docket No. #37 : Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2022 and Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2022 02:00 PM The June 21st proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2022)
April 18, 2022 Filing 36 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Court takes the pending #21 motion for judgment on the pleadings filings under submission. The hearing previously scheduled for April 21, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. is vacated. The Court will issue a written order. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2022)
March 24, 2022 Filing 35 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. #21 . Notice is hereby given that the hearing on the motion set for April 21, 2022 will be held in-person before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2022)
March 15, 2022 Filing 34 CLERK'S NOTICE: You are hereby notified that the hearing set for 3/17/2022 re: #12 motion to remand and initial case management conference is vacated. Court finds that the matter is appropriate for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2022)
March 14, 2022 Filing 33 CLERK'S NOTICE RE DOCKET NO. 30. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference and the hearing on the motion set for March 17, 2022 will be held telephonically. This proceeding will be held by AT&T Conference Line. The parties are advised that in the event of an audio problem, counsel should be prepared to attend the hearing via Zoom conference at the Courts direction. The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone.For conference line information, see: https://apps.cand.uscourts.gov/telhrg/ All counsel, members of the public and press please use the following dial-in information below to access the conference line: Dial In: 888-808-6929Access Code: 6064255The Court may be in session with proceedings in progress when you connect to the conference line. Therefore, mute your phone if possible and wait for the Court to address you before speaking on the line. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines. The parties are further advised to ensure that the Court can hear and understand them clearly before speaking at length.PLEASE NOTE: Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. See General Order 58 at Paragraph III. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2022)
March 9, 2022 Filing 32 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 3/9/2022)
February 23, 2022 Filing 31 REPLY (re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 2/23/2022)
February 22, 2022 Filing 30 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the Initial Case Management Conference and the hearing on the #12 Motion to Remand previously set for March 17, 2022 will be held on this date at 1:00 p.m. Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the parties will be advised closer to the hearing whether it will take place telephonically or in person. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2022)
January 26, 2022 Filing 29 Request for Judicial Notice re #28 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byEddy Farrales. (Related document(s) #28 ) (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 1/26/2022)
January 26, 2022 Filing 28 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 1/26/2022)
December 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING Dkt. No. #25 the parties' stipulation regarding the briefing schedule on Dkt. No. #21 Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings. The Court finds that there is good cause to modify the briefing schedule. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall respond to the motion on or before January 26, 2022, and Defendant shall file the reply in support of the motion on or before February 23, 2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (hsglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2021)
December 24, 2021 Filing 26 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Eddy Farrales filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/24/2021)
December 24, 2021 Filing 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Requesting Change in Briefing Schedule filed by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/24/2021)
December 23, 2021 Filing 24 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 23, 2021 Filing 23 Certificate of Interested Entities by Eddy Farrales (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 23, 2021 Filing 22 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/23/2021)
December 22, 2021 Filing 21 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 4/21/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 1/5/2022. Replies due by 1/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/22/2021)
December 17, 2021 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE. Notice is hereby given that the initial case management conference, previously set for January 4, 2022, is continued to March 17, 2022, at 2:00 p.m., to be held along with the hearing on the #12 motion to remand. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 19 OBJECTIONS to re #15 Opposition/Response to Motion by Eddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 16, 2021 Filing 18 REPLY (re #12 MOTION to Remand ) filed byEddy Farrales. (Chae, Larry) (Filed on 12/16/2021)
December 15, 2021 Filing 17 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2021)
December 3, 2021 Filing 16 Request for Judicial Notice re #15 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #15 ) (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/3/2021)
December 3, 2021 Filing 15 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #12 MOTION to Remand ) filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Amir Nassihi, #2 Exhibit A)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 12/3/2021)
November 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting #13 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's #12 Motion to Remand. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021)
November 1, 2021 Reset Deadlines as to #12 MOTION to Remand, See Docket No. #14 : Responses due by 12/3/2021 and Replies due by 12/17/2021. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2021)
October 29, 2021 Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/29/2021)
October 29, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION to Remand filed by Eddy Farrales. Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2022 02:00 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 2, 4th Floor before Judge Haywood S Gilliam Jr.. Responses due by 11/12/2021. Replies due by 11/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chae, Larry) (Filed on 10/29/2021)
October 18, 2021 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #7 Consent/Declination to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge, #9 Order Reassigning Case,, Case Assigned/Reassigned, (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/18/2021)
October 14, 2021 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE.Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for January 4, 2022, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m. Case Management Statement due by December 28th. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. All future filings should reflect the case number as 4:21-cv-07624-HSG. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by The Clerk on 10/14/21. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
October 13, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 10/13/2021)
September 30, 2021 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re 1 Notice of Removal,, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities,, #5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 4 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #3 Notice (Other) (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/30/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/27/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/3/2022 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/13/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company to the United States District Court that Notice of Removal of Action has been Filed in State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Corporate Parent State Street Corporation (parent of State Street Bank and Trust Company, which is the trustee of the Ford defined contribution plans), Corporate Parent Evercore Trust Company, N.A. (fiduciary of the Ford defined contribution plan), Corporate Parent Black Rock, Inc. and certain affiliates, Corporate Parent The Vanguard Group and certain affiliates for Ford Motor Company. (Nassihi, Amir) (Filed on 9/29/2021)
September 29, 2021 Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byFord Motor Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farrales v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eddy Farrales
Represented By: Larry Chae
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Amir M. Nassihi
Represented By: Rodrigo Enrique Salas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?