Turon v. San Francisco et al
Michael J. Turon |
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Planning Department, San Francisco Board of Appeals and San Francisco Zoning Administrator |
3:2021cv07724 |
October 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
William H Orrick |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Crossman, Brian) (Filed on 11/15/2021) |
Filing 16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR FILE OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING OR MOTION filed by City and County of San Francisco. (Crossman, Brian) (Filed on 10/25/2021) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael J. Turon. All Defendants. Proof of Service on City and County of San Francisco (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Planning Board of Appeals, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Planning Department, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Zoning Administrator)(Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael J. Turon Proof of Service re #11 Case Management Order (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/20/2021) Modified on 10/20/2021 linking entry to document #11 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael J. Turon Proof of Service (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
Filing 12 ***INCORRECT EVENT*** CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Michael J. Turon Proof of Service on City and County of San Francisco (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Planning Department, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Board of Appeals, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service on San Francisco Zoning Administrator)(Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/20/2021) Modified on 10/20/2021 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). |
![]() |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety using correct event "Summons Returned Executed" Re: #12 Certificate of Service, filed by Michael J. Turon (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
#Electronic filing error. Document not properly linked. [err102]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #14 Certificate of Service filed by Michael J . Turon (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2021) |
![]() |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Michael J. Turon.. (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Board of Appeals, San Francisco Planning Department, San Francisco Zoning Administrator. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/29/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/5/2022 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/15/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
Filing 4 Statement Request for Preparation of Record of Proceedings by Michael J. Turon. (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by Michael J. Turon identifying Other Affiliate Lauren R. Turon, Other Affiliate Douglas A. Greenberg for Michael J. Turon. (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages; Petition for Writ and Request for Immediate Stay; Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16456108.). Filed byMichael J. Turon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Patterson, Ryan) (Filed on 10/1/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.