Harris v. Monsanto Company et al
Danielle Harris |
Wilbur-Ellis Nutrition, LLC, Monsanto Company, Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC, Wilbur-Ellis Feed, LLC and Standard Cent Stores doing business as Laurel Ace Hardware |
3:2021cv07738 |
October 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Vince Chhabria |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 pl |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 REPLY (re #6 MOTION to Remand (PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES) ) filed byDanielle Harris. (Menzies, Karen) (Filed on 11/23/2021) |
Filing 7 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #6 MOTION to Remand (PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES) ) filed byMonsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1 Plaintiff Request for Dismissal (Stephens), #3 Exhibit 2 Plaintiff Request for Dismissal (Clark), #4 Exhibit 3 Plaintiff Request for Dismissal (Johnson))(Lasker, Eric) (Filed on 11/17/2021) |
Filing 6 Plaintiff's NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Danielle Harris. Motion Hearing set for 12/9/2021 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 11/17/2021. Replies due by 11/24/2021. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Patrick B. McAndrew, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Declaration)(Menzies, Karen) (Filed on 11/3/2021) Modified on 11/4/2021 (jlg, COURT STAFF). |
MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 2741: Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-07738-VC cc: JPMDL (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021) |
Cases associated: Create association to 3:16-md-02741-VC. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (asS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2021) |
Answer to Removal Complaint (Refer to Document 1-1, Page 66) byMonsanto Company. (jlgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Monsanto Company re #1 Notice of Removal, (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Corporate Parent Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. (Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Harris/Wilson Lawsuit from San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-21-589182. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16459810). Filed byMonsanto Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fayne, Samuel) (Filed on 10/4/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.