Garcia v. Rafael et al
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Defendant: Carmel Rafael and Xia Xiao
Case Number: 3:2021cv07753
Filed: October 5, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Referring Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: American with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Xia Xiao.. (Shen, Stanley) (Filed on 11/29/2021)
November 29, 2021 Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by Xia Xiao. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Shen, Stanley) (Filed on 11/29/2021)
November 17, 2021 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orlando Garcia. Carmel Rafael served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/17/2021)
November 12, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Orlando Garcia. Xia Xiao served on 11/4/2021, answer due 11/26/2021. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 11/12/2021)
October 8, 2021 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING DEADLINE TO FILE STATUS REPORT. Status Report due by 4/5/2022. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2021)
October 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/08/2021. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2021)
October 7, 2021 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 6, 2021 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Orlando Garcia.. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/6/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Orlando Garcia. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/19/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Orlando Garcia re #1 Complaint (Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/5/2021)
October 5, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-16463188.). Filed byOrlando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seabock, Amanda) (Filed on 10/5/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Rafael et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Orlando Garcia
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Prathima Reddy Price
Represented By: Amanda Lockhart Seabock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carmel Rafael
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xia Xiao
Represented By: Stanley C Shen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?