Rodriguez v. Gonsalves & Santucci, Inc.
Plaintiff: Elmer N Rodriguez
Defendant: Gonsalves & Santucci, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv07874
Filed: October 7, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 185
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2021 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 12/30 /2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2022 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 7, 2021 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/21/2021. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 7, 2021 Filing 3 Declaration of Jessica Fraser in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration in Support by Gregory G. Iskander filed byGonsalves & Santucci, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Related document(s) #1 , #2 ) (Iskander, Gregory) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 7, 2021 Filing 2 Declaration of Gregory G. Iskander in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byGonsalves & Santucci, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Class Action Complaint)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Iskander, Gregory) (Filed on 10/7/2021)
October 7, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is C21-01735. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0971-16475257). Filed byGonsalves & Santucci, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Iskander, Gregory) (Filed on 10/7/2021)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Gonsalves & Santucci, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elmer N Rodriguez
Represented By: David D Bibiyan
Represented By: Diego F Aviles
Represented By: Sara Ehsani-Nia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gonsalves & Santucci, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory G. Iskander
Represented By: William Jie Woo Kim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?