Swanson v. Monsanto Company et al
| Naomi Swanson |
| Monsanto Company and DOES 1-50 |
| 3:2021cv08047 |
| October 14, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Naomi Swanson] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 10/19/2021) |
| Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Naomi Swanson] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 10/19/2021) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Naomi Swanson] by Monsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 10/19/2021) Modified on 10/20/2021 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED: District of Georgia Northern, 1:21-cv-01799, Swanson v. Monsanto Company et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:21-cv-08047-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order CTO 290 cc: JPMDL (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2021) |
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Northern; Case Number 1:21-cv-01799. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 8 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER CTO-290 from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Case transferred to Northern District of California for inclusion MDL No. 2741. (bgt) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (bgt) |
| Submission of #6 Order, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (ceo) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Naomi Swanson. Monsanto Company served on 8/30/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. (Fitzpatrick, Nathan) |
Filing 6
ORDER: Plaintiff Naomi Swanson filed the Complaint in this action on April 30, 2021. #1 . As of today, Plaintiff has not filed proof of service of process upon Defendants, and there is no evidence in the record that demonstrates Plaintiff has properly served Defendants. Accordingly, within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this order, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file a notice either showing that service has in fact been properly made or providing why Plaintiff has been unable to serve Defendants. The Court warns Plaintiff that her failure to file such a notice will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to submit this case after expiration of the ten (10)-day period. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 08/27/21. (ceo)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
|
Filing 4
ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO GENERAL ORDER 20-01 RE: COURT OPERATIONS UNDER THE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES CREATED BY COVID-19 AND RELATED CORONAVIRUS. Signed by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 3/9/2021. (jpk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan Edward Fitzpatrick on behalf of Naomi Swanson (jpk) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (jpk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Naomi Swanson. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-10940822) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jpk) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
